Above, a scene from “The Family Fang.” (Photo credit: Red Crown Productions)

By Mark Olsen
Los Angeles Times

TORONTO — Jason Bateman has navigated a few tricky transitions in his career with a low-key charm that has made it look far easier than it must have actually been. Once a child actor on such television shows as “Silver Spoons,” he re-emerged as a deadpan everyman on TV’s “Arrested Development” and in films such as “Horrible Bosses.”

His first film as director was the acerbic comedy “Bad Words,” in which he also starred. The film was picked up two years ago at the Toronto International Film Festival in 2013.

Bateman was back in Toronto with his second film as director, the tonally ambitious “The Family Fang.” It’s an adaptation of Kevin Wilson’s popular 2011 novel with a screenplay by Pulitzer Prize winner David Lindsay-Abaire and stars Nicole Kidman alongside Bateman as troubled siblings.

Many notices for the book pinned it as a comedy with deeper emotional currents; the film recasts the story somewhat by emphasizing its darker, more dramatic heft.

In an interview here Tuesday, Bateman said he always saw the material as more dramatic than comedic.

“I never read the book in that way,” he said. “From the book, the subject matter and themes were always very dramatic and very human. I thought that Kevin was addressing something that was pretty emotional in a very entertaining way. So that was always the order that I saw things, a drama that had some moments of levity and comedy and eccentricity.”

The world premiere screening was introduced by the festival’s director of programming, Kerri Craddock, who expressed particular enthusiasm for Bateman’s late-‘80s/early-‘90s sitcom “The Hogan Family” — “I haven’t met a lot of ‘Hogan Family’ fans,” Bateman noted dryly when he came onstage.

Yet it was directing a few episodes of that show that got Bateman, now 46, into the Director’s Guild at the age of 18.

The story of his new film revolves around a family with the last name of Fang. The parents, Caleb and Camille (Christopher Walken and Maryann Plunkett), are performance artists of moderate reputation, best known for the way in which they used their children Annie and Baxter in their pieces, such as staging a bank robbery over lollipops or being purposefully terrible street musicians.

Annie (Kidman) and Baxter (Bateman) have subsequently struggled to find their own identities in adulthood. Annie is an actress of some notoriety, though as much for her public meltdowns as her performances, while Baxter is a struggling novelist and magazine journalist.

When Caleb and Camille disappear under mysterious circumstances, Annie and Baxter are suspicious that this is just another stunt, and they set about trying to discover the truth about their parents and find out some new truths about themselves.

It is perhaps not difficult to see what in that story line of child performers moving forward with their adult lives may have spoken directly to Bateman.

“My upbringing as a child was very atypical,” Bateman said. “Started acting when I was 10, my parents being my manager, there’s a lot of overlap in this film from the way in which I was brought up. So this was something I certainly didn’t see as some kind of surface piece of entertainment.

“Although I didn’t try to drag any of my own personal baggage into it, I certainly had a clear idea of what a version of this film might look and feel like if it were to represent children who had a nontraditional upbringing.”

The project began with Kidman, also a producer on the film, acquiring the rights to Wilson’s book. When Wilson declined to write the adaptation himself, Lindsay-Abaire, who adapted his own “Rabbit Hole,” which Kidman starred in, was brought on. Bateman, as he says, raised his hand for the chance to direct and costar. (Kidman, currently onstage in London in a production of “Photograph 51,” was not in attendance at the premiere. The book’s author was among those in the audience.)

In an early review in Variety, Justin Chang called the film “a sharply drawn portrait” and that Bateman “shows marked progress and deepening maturity as a filmmaker with this cleverly structured but never arch or mechanical adaptation.”

After the film, as Bateman and Walken stepped onstage for a Q&A, there was a standing ovation for Walken.

Of observing Bateman as director and actor, Walken said that “I was impressed every day. I couldn’t believe it, the ease with which he went back and forth between directing the movie, which is a handful, and playing the scenes. His focus and concentration, really, it’s amazing.”

In one dialogue scene in particular, Bateman stands on a staircase in the family home in the back of the frame, obscured in darkness, just a shadow in profile, while Kidman is closer to the camera and seen more clearly. It’s not hard to imagine Bateman the actor debating with Bateman the director over the fact he can’t be seen.

“Directing films is incredibly exciting to me,” Bateman said. “All my decisions come from that place, it’s never to serve me as an actor. To have the privileged position of being the guy who is responsible for shaping the entire experience for an audience as opposed to being just one instrument in that orchestra, being an actor, it’s all-encompassing. Regardless of whether that … actor wants a close-up.”

Both as director and actor, with “The Family Fang,” Bateman has taken another bold step in a career that is full of self-aware reinvention and determination, a mix of comedy and drama, lightness and dark.

As Bateman said while finishing his introduction to the film at the premiere, “It turned out exactly the way I wanted it to, for better or worse.”